Welcome to The World Of
 
   TMM International Home : Mypage
TMM India Home : Mypage  

:: Back 2 School
Finance
Human Resources
Information Technology
Manufacturing
Marketing
Strategic Management
 


Why Projects Invariably Get Delayed?

The problems faced by most project managers are the same irrespective of the kind of project they handle. Projects could range from anything like constructing a bridge or development of new product or implementation of ERP systems. Almost all project managers find it difficult to meet project deadlines because of resource constraints and non-availability of information when required. As a result they end up changing the original project specifications to meet deadlines.

The primary reason for delayed projects is significant safety time that is provided to individual project activities. Three reasons why project managers provide this extra safety time are:

a) To account for the worst-case scenario. Assume the actual time required to assemble a prototype is 2 days and the median time is 4 days. In case of some unforeseen problems it may take 15 days to complete the assembly. Under these circumstances, the project manager will not agree to an estimate of 4 days to complete the prototype assembly, as there are 50% chances of not completing the activity on schedule. The time asked is more likely to be closer to 15 days.

b) To make sure that each activity in the project is completed in time. Since no one wants to be responsible for any delays in the project, there is a tendency to inflate this safety time. More and more safety time gets added to the project as the number of management levels increase.

c) To protect against a global cut. Subordinates add more safety time to the activities to prevent top management from imposing global cuts.

In the above example if the project manager gives an estimated completion time of 12 days, then the safety time is 8 days. Safety time is defined as the difference between estimated completion time and median completion time.

Most of the project completion time can be attributed to the safety time added in each individual activity. The question then is why do projects still get delayed despite the counter measure of providing enough safety time? There are three factors which lead to this delay.

Firstly, interdependence of activities leads to adding up of delays. A delay in one activity is passed onto the next dependent activity, resulting in late starts upsetting the schedule and creating problems in resource availability. On the other hand any gains made from completing the activities before time are not passed onto the project as the next activity still begins at the scheduled time. Besides, there is no incentive to report the early completion of an activity. A consistently good record in finishing activities before time might lead to a cut in the estimated time of future activities.

Secondly, the availability of extra safety time leads to a laid back attitude. Engineers do not feel any urgency to finish the activities as they feel there is ample time available. The activity doesn’t start until a major part of the safety time has already elapsed. Any contingency at the last moment leads to fire fighting to meet deadlines.

Thirdly, resource allocation for multiple projects also causes a delay in projects. Multiple tasks are often scheduled to be completed during the same time period, which eats into the available safety time. Adding more safety time to activities compounds the problem all the more. Increased safety time means increased project duration, which in turn increases the probability of multiple ongoing projects and multitasking.

Despite the highly developed tools available for project management, conventional project management techniques fall short of providing a solution to the above-mentioned problems. One can easily conclude that these techniques are inherently flawed. The conclusion is corroborated by the fact that according to conventional project management theory, out of the three factors - project completion time, project content and project costs, one has to be compromised to accomplish the other two. Recent developments, however, have shown that this is not true.

The next article discusses the critical chain method of project management based Theory of Constraints which helps project managers in executing projects as per schedule.

Related Reading: Manage your projects for success: An application of the theory of constraints. Umble, M.; Production and Inventory Management Journal, 06/2000.


Introduction  |  Contents   |  Top

Feedback or Comments?

Designed and Maintained by C & K Management Limited

© Copyright 2003 C & K Management Limited