Fire
Fighters
E-mail
hoaxes can have drastic effects on a company’s standing
Think
of how much e-mail you receive each day. Now think how many
your office and others receive every single day in the vicinity.
Imagine how horrifying it must be for a marketer to hear
that a vicious hoax about their brand is circulating via
e-mail. The hot message doing the rounds on the web recently
was of a tooth being kept in a beverage bottle and vanishing
due to the chemical reaction. Imagine the kind of effect
this would have on the company’s standing in the market!
The
effectWhat happens to the company’s image or for that
matter to the perceptions of consumers and others who are
connected with the company?
- Loss of loyal customers.
- Negative publicity
- Effect on overall product range
- Competitor’s advantage
- Retailers and other intermediaries refuse to stock
products
The
PR machine of the company intervenes quashing what is being
said or rather mailed. However with the web being unregulated
and no body as such to govern what is being said or done,
how does a company fight it out in the big bad net world?
Someone with a destructive frame of mind can cause serious
damage to the value of your brand! Looking at it from another
point of view, it is not the people who send such messages
but the people to whom it is being sent that matter.
Indians
are comparatively new to the Internet. They are not advanced
enough in the e-mail culture to dismiss such things as fake.
A storeowner selling that beverage would be less likely
to ignore his customers who demand answers based on the
e-mail they receive. The speed at which e-mail allows mass
communication is another problem. With a click of the mouse,
half the country would think something is wrong when it
isn’t. While a brand’s PR team could be quelling
a handful of customers’ fears, another one thousand
could be receiving the same message.
Look
at the hoax spread about KFC (Kentucky Fried Chicken). In
January 2000, an e-mail was circulated to ten thousand making
unfounded and baseless accusations about its production
process. The e-mail falsely claimed that the company had
cut production costs by breeding artificial birds with no
beaks, feathers, or bones. It is such e-mail that can ruin
a company’s reputation.
Restoration
If
your brand is subjected to an e-mail hoax, what can your
PR do to retaliate?
Make sure that every point of contact in the company has
a clear statement to make. This should ward off the issue
from your company by alluding to similar problems of other
companies, and then state that the hoax is untrue by providing
enough evidence.
The
statement should convey a positive brand image thereby erasing
all doubts in the minds of the consumers. For instance,
KFC asserted, “ Our chickens are reared in traditional
environment with no use of genetic manipulation or artificial
nutrients.”
Offer your story to a paper. Build good press coverage,
providing facts hence deterring media frenzy.
Businesses
should encourage consumers to request brand information,
what goes on in the making, the list of ingredients to minimise
the effect of slander.
Regularly
enhance the packaging copy about ingredients used in the
product.
Get
someone specialised in that field to endorse the product.
Influence
opinion leaders and widespread media through conviction
and if possible taking them on a tour about the manufacturing
process.
Gaining
an Advantage
The
business of using e-mail constructively is still in its
infancy. The net is a grey area in the context of personalised
mails that cannot be tracked. Nothing can be done about
it! Other than a code of ‘netiquette’ there seems
to be little to restrain cyber-terrorists from spreading
defamatory claims. Companies must be constantly aware of
the possibility of attack and be prepared to defend themselves
in an instant.
Related
Reading:
1.
“Crimes and Misdeminors”(1287)
Daniel Kadlec
Time, New York, October 2000
2.
“Don’t be e-hoaxed”(1288)
Chris Taylor
Time, New York, 08 November, 1999.
3.
“Ask Bill Gates”(1289)
Bill Gates
Management Today, London, September 1999.