The
Strength of the Invisible
Using
InterBrand's Brand Strength model to evaluate a brand
The
concept of brand valuation was developed to recognise brand
value on a balance sheet. However, not every brand meets
with the criteria that allow clear valuation: should be
separately identifiable, able to be protected legally, should
be transferable and enduring in nature.

The relationship between the brand strength and brand value
follows a normal distribution represented by the “S”
curve. As the brand evolves from a weak brand to a strong
one, the curve shifts to the right. The multiple on the
y-axis is determined by making use of all brands in that
particular segment/industry. The brand strength variables
are then correlated to a multiple such as price ratio to
gauge the level of confidence of the brand in the future.
The brand multiple must then be added to brand profit to
derive the true value of brand equity.
Interbrand
is a pioneer in brand valuation. Their Brand Strength Model
is used to determine the value of a brand based on the assumption
that a strong brand is more reliable for future earnings
with lesser risk. Under this approach, a brand’s strength
comprises of seven variables:
Leadership:
A brand that dominates the market in its category using
economies of scale.
Stability: It is etched in the consumer’s mind
since its inception.
Market: Brands in markets such as convenience food
items, soft drinks and consumer durables score high over
brands in technology-driven (computers) or highly fashionable
(apparel) categories, since these markets are more vulnerable
to technological or taste changes. A brand in a stable but
growing market with strong entry barriers will score high
in brand strength. Colgate-Palmolive, for instance, has
got a strong foothold in the toothpaste market making it
difficult for competitors to enter.
Geographic: The value of a brand is measured in terms
of its attractiveness and acceptance in multiple markets.
Making a mark internationally adds to brand strength.
Trend: The over-all long-term trend (of the brand)
is a measure of its ability to remain contemporary and retain
consumers by being relevant to their needs and wants.
Support: The assessment of qualitative and quantitative
support provided by the company to the brand.
Protection: The extent of legal support a brand possesses
is very crucial in its assessment.
The
location of the Brand
| Strength |
Maximum
Value
|
| Leadership |
25
|
| Stability |
15
|
| Market |
10
|
| Geographic
Spread |
25
|
| Trend |
10
|
| Support |
10
|
| Protection |
05
|
| Total: |
100
|
In
this approach there is a weak link from the marketer’s
perspective. There is an inadequate measure of the consumer’s
perception of the brand, which is critical for decision-making.
The Interbrand approach is amongst the first of its kind
and refinements to the model will follow.
Successful
organisations of the future will be marked by mastery of
their intangible assets: clarifying, evaluating, managing
and communicating their value.
Related
Readings:
1. “Do you know how Flexible your Brand is?” ; Chevron,
Jacques; Brandweek; July 2000
2. “Building Strong Brands”; David A. Aaker; 1996